Skip to main content
· 2/17/1890

Smith v. Loag

Citations

  • 132 Pa. 301
  • 19 A. 137
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 811

Syllabus

<p>In an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract to supply patented articles at prices to be agreed upon from time to time, when in l'aet no price was ever agreed upon between the parties, it was not error to charge the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover nominal damages only.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claimant who leaves his job for any firm offer of employment, without regard to whether it is better employment, has left for good cause
  • holding that a claimant who leaves his job for any firm offer of employment, without regard to whether it is better employment, has left for good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.