Skip to main content

Smith v. Lewis

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 124
  • 2006 Tenn. LEXIS 837
  • 2006 WL 2623211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a sentence is illegal and void because it included a release eligibility date in contravention of a statute
  • granting habeas corpus relief to a prisoner because the judgment of conviction was void on its face
  • stating, “As this Court has stated previously, “[a] void or illegal sentence is one whose imposition directly contravenes a statute.” (citations omitted)
  • looking to both the plea document and the transcript of the plea submission hearing to determine that the befouled provision was not prominent in the overall agreement
  • unless illegality is proven to be a bargained-for element of the plea agreement, proper remedy is remand to the convicting court for correction of judgment
  • petitioner’s guilty plea and conviction were not void where record did not demonstrate on its face that the illegal provision of early release eligibility was a bargained-for element of petitioner’s plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.