Skip to main content
· 6/5/1964

Smith v. Konsak

Citations

  • 230 F. Supp. 308
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well- established that the function of a motion for reconsideration is to present the court with an opportunity to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to consider newly discovered evidence. . . .” (quotations and citation omitted)
  • Docket No. 27, Pl. Memo. at 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.