Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that circumstantial evidence may support a jury’s verdict when the evidence justifies the jury’s inferences and the jury’s inferences outweigh conflicting inferences
• preferring to instruct “with regard to the meaning of concurring cause,” but finding “nothing in this record to prejudice the jury in its consideration and application of the law of direct cause as it affected either party”
• preferring to instruct “with regard to the meaning of concurring cause,” but finding “nothing in this record to prejudice the jury in its consideration and application of the law of direct cause as it affected either party”
• “[C]ausation, like negligence itself, is a fact issue for the jury except when the facts are undisputed and are reasonably susceptible of but one inference.”
• “[C]ausation, like negligence itself, is a fact issue for the jury except when the facts are undisputed and are reasonably susceptible of but one inference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).