Massachusetts Appeals Court· 6/22/2007
Smith v. Jones
Citations
- 69 Mass. App. Ct. 400
- 868 N.E.2d 629
- 2007 Mass. App. LEXIS 703
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the Massachusetts courts' similar \reluctance to adopt a bright-line time requirement” and noting that a failure to satisfy any particular duration element \would not likely be sufficient for a conclusion that no de facto parenthood status existed”
- discussing the Massachusetts courts’ similar “reluctance to adopt a bright-line time requirement” and noting that a failure to satisfy any particular duration element “would not likely be sufficient for a conclusion that no de facto parenthood status existed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doerfer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-18· cited 186×
- Adoption of HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-10-14· cited 118×
- E.N.O. v. L.M.M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-29· cited 91×
- Youmans v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-22· cited 64×
- Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-06-30· cited 63×
- Paternity of CherylMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-24· cited 48×
- T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-25· cited 43×
- Mason v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-07-10· cited 43×
- A.H. v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-12-08· cited 21×
- Care & Protection of SharleneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-01-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.