Skip to main content
· 2/2/2010

Smith v. Johnson and Johnson

Citations

  • 593 F.3d 280
  • 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1345
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2182
  • 2010 WL 347911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Secretary’s regulations have “controlling weight”
  • “[A] party, without taking a cross-appeal, may urge in support of an order from which an appeal has been taken any matter appearing in the record.”
  • “Yet a party, without taking a cross-appeal, may urge in support of ah order from which an appeal has been taken any matter appearing in the record, at least if the party relied on it in the district court.”
  • “Yet a party, without taking a cross-appeal, may urge in support of an order from which an appeal has been taken any matter appearing in the record, at least if the party relied on it in the district court.”
  • “Yet a party, without taking a cross-appeal, 30 may urge in support of an order from which an appeal has been taken any matter appearing in the record, at least if the party relied on it in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Jordan, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.