Skip to main content
· 8/24/2009

Smith v. Janey

Citations

  • 664 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74832
  • 2009 WL 2584821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there is no individual liability under the ADEA
  • finding that there is no individual liability under the ADEA
  • applying California’s fraudulent misrepresentation law 2 and finding diminished “resale values on plaintiffs’ cars” sufficient
  • dismissing disability claims under the ADA because “plaintiff's administrative charge did not -7- identify disability as a basis for his claim”
  • “[P]laintiff fails to identify any contract that obligated defendant 8 Option One to conduct itself in a particular manner with respect to these allegations.”
  • “Because ‘the government entity receive[d] notice and an opportunity to respond,’ the Court will construe the complaint as one brought against only the District of Columbia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.