Smith v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is well settled that where one party has a judgment the other can never set off against that judgment a claim not reduced to judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miguel v. McCarl
  Supreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 109×
• State ex rel. Payne v. Reeves
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1921-10-27· cited 50×
• West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay Secretary of Interior
  D.C. Circuit· 1954-06-01· cited 41×
• Jones v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1925-04-13· cited 41×
• McCarl v. Cox
  D.C. Circuit· 1925-11-02· cited 13×
• Dillon v. Groos
  N.D. Florida· 1924-05-15· cited 8×
• McCarl v. Pence
  D.C. Circuit· 1927-04-04· cited 7×
• Mare v. Alexander
  D. Massachusetts· 1924-11-28· cited 4×
• Alexander v. Mare
  First Circuit· 1925-06-12· cited 4×
• Gideon B. And Audrey J. Williamson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Eighth Circuit· 1955-07-14· cited 3×
• United States v. Robert Grant and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
  Seventh Circuit· 1956-10-15· cited 3×
• Hetfield v. Barber
  S.D. California· 1924-11-28· cited 2×
• Emerson v. Baker
  N.D. Georgia· 1925-01-30· cited 1×
• President Reagan's Ability to Receive Retirement Benefits From the State of California
  Office of Legal Counsel· 1981-06-23
• Hanna v. Commissioner
  Ninth Circuit· 1946-05-21