Smith v. Iowa Board of Medical Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the “recitation” of what occurred in a lower proceeding “is not a substitute for the required appellate record”
• stating the “recitation” of what occurred in a lower proceeding “is not a substitute for the required appellate record”
• stating the “recitation” of what occurred in a lower proceeding “is not a substitute for the required appellate record”
• stating a “recitation” of what occurred in a lower proceeding “is not a substitute for the required appellate record”
• finding board’s dissemination of information about the denial of a physician’s license was “other agency action”
• \The district court's recitation of these matters in its ruling is not a substitute for the required appellate record.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).