Arizona Supreme Court· 7/19/1976

Smith v. Industrial Commission

Citations

552 P.2d 1198
113 Ariz. 304
1976 Ariz. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “[s]ubjective complaints of pain” are not within the scope of the AMA Guides, but are still compensable
accident-produced pain preventing an injured worker from returning to heavy work was compensable even though the pain was merely a subjective finding and not ratable under the AMA Guides
accident-produced pain preventing an injured worker from returning to heavy work was compensable even though the pain was merely a subjective finding and not ratable under the AMA Guides
adopting definition of “permanent impairment” in AMA Guides
Guides do not cover subjective complaints of pain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Smith v. Industrial Commission

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.