Smith v. Hurley-Mason Co.

Citations

• 67 Wash. 683
• 122 P. 361
• 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1232

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Implied Contract. The fact that a contractor took up the work of a defaulting subcontractor and made use of the remaining lumber sold and delivered to the subcontractor, does not imply a contract on the part of the contractor to pay the lumber company the price due for the lumber sold, no agreement with the subcontractor to that effect being shown, and there being no lien on the completed work for the material furnished.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Findings—Exceptions. The absence of exceptions to the findings does not preclude inquiry as to whether the findings and admitted facts sustain the judgment.</p>