Smith v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While there was no direct contradiction of parts of the witness’ testimony, the witness was sufficiently impeached and his testimony so contradictory in itself, that the trial court was warranted in disregarding his evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kysar
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-11-21· cited 76×
• Hurst v. Hurst
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-09-22· cited 23×
• Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit Union
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 8×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Ridgeway v. Logan
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1952-01-08· cited 8×