Skip to main content
· 3/24/1995

Smith v. Holtz

Citations

  • 879 F. Supp. 435
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3721
  • 1995 WL 134743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Heck applied to Fourteenth Amendment due process claim for deprivation of a fair trial due to the withholding of exculpatory evidence
  • holding that Heck applied to Fourteenth Amendment due process claim for deprivation of a fair trial due to the withholding of exculpatory evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCLURE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.