Smith v. Hixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[b]ecause ‘Prime Bank’ instruments do not exist, courts have held that promoters of such schemes acted, at a minimum, recklessly” and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Hixon
  S.D. Alabama· 1957-02-25· cited 8×
• Simmons v. Bomar
  M.D. Tennessee· 1964-01-07· cited 2×
• Sidney C. Smith v. S. W. Hixon, Warden, Atmore State Prison, Atmore, Alabama
  Fifth Circuit· 1957-11-06

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1953-01-22· cited 36×
• Wise v. Spears
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1917-11-15· cited 28×
• Woollomes v. Heinze, Warden of California State Prison at Folsom
  Ninth Circuit· 1952-09-16· cited 17×
• Buchanan v. O'Brien
  First Circuit· 1950-05-25· cited 13×
• Latham v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1955-01-13· cited 13×
• Baker v. Ellis
  Fifth Circuit· 1952-03-18· cited 12×
• Otis Loper v. O. B. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System
  Fifth Circuit· 1955-08-02· cited 10×
• Johnson v. Wilson
  Fifth Circuit· 1942-11-05· cited 10×
• Caldwell v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1952-10-07· cited 9×
• Kilgore v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1954-10-07· cited 8×
• Porch v. Cagle, Sheriff
  Fifth Circuit· 1952-11-06· cited 7×