Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/15/1986
Smith v. Hevro Realty Corp.
Citations
- 199 Conn. 330
- 507 A.2d 980
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 774
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where right of first refusal required compliance with terms of offer; failure to do so renders option invalid
- “Unless the parties have agreed to the contrary, acceptance under an option contract is not effective until it is actually received by the offeror.”
- determination of terms and conditions of a contract is a question to be resolved by the trier of fact
- exercise of option was ineffective when lessee failed to tender payment at time of exercise as required by option
- ‘‘The principles that govern the interpretation of an option contract are well-settled. To be effective, an acceptance of an offer under an option contract must be unequivocal, unconditional, and in exact accord with the terms of the option.’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
- 31 Conn. L. Rptr. 55
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 62×
- Jones v. StahrNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-03-25· cited 29×
- John D. Stump & Associates, Inc. v. Cunningham Memorial Park, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-05-29· cited 24×
- Natural Harmony, Inc. v. NormandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-09· cited 23×
- Santos v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-10· cited 18×
- Romaniello v. PensieroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-03-20· cited 14×
- Cutter Development Corp. v. PelusoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-11· cited 13×
- Papagorgiou v. AnastopoulousConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-09-15· cited 12×
- Bidache, Inc. v. MartinWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 11×
- Urban Hotel Management Corp. v. Main & Washington Joint VentureIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-06-25· cited 11×
- Scoville v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-12-14· cited 11×
- Webster Trust v. RolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-06· cited 8×
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-09· cited 8×
- Briggs v. SylvestriConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-30· cited 6×
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. TufteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-02-07· cited 5×
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-02-05· cited 4×
- Old Quarry Ass'n v. HickeyD. Connecticut· 1986-08-15· cited 3×
- David Meyers, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-06· cited 2×
- Pack 2000, Inc. v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-05-20
- Howard-Arnold, Inc. v. T.N.T. Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-03-03
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-04-07· cited 100×
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-03-06· cited 90×
- Heyman v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-03· cited 68×
- Texaco, Inc. v. RogowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-03-08· cited 54×
- Pigeon v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-02-27· cited 38×
- Frumento v. MezzanotteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-10· cited 36×
- Vachon v. TomascakSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-05-03· cited 30×
- Rahmati v. MehriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-11-30· cited 30×
- Coombs v. OuzounianUtah Supreme Court· 1970-02-17· cited 28×
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-02-14· cited 27×
- Texas Co. v. Crown Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1950-08-08· cited 26×
- Katz v. Pratt Street Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-03-03· cited 25×
- Gallicchio Bros., Inc. v. C & S OIL CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-16· cited 24×
- Crowley v. Texaco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 23×
- Miller v. CarmodySupreme Court of Colorado· 1963-05-27· cited 20×
- Ross v. Shawmut Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 18×
- Imperial Refineries Corporation v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Iowa· 1963-02-12· cited 18×
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. HallsIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 12×
- New Haven Trap Rock Co. v. TataSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-01-23· cited 12×
- H. M. R., Inc. v. BoeckenhauerIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-23· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.