Skip to main content
· 12/12/2005

Smith v. Heartland Automotive Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 404 F. Supp. 2d 1144
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 275
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32696
  • 2005 WL 3388138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • limiting consideration on motion for decertification to whether plaintiffs are similarly situated and setting aside issue of whether plaintiffs are properly classified as exempt
  • decertifying a misclassification action because “[the plaintiffs] rest too heavily on the similarity within the class regarding the time spent on non-exempt duties”
  • staying decertification order for 60 days to toll statute of limitations
  • staying decertification order for 60 days to toll statute of limitations
  • “Courts consider three factors at this second stage: (1) the employment and factual settings of the plaintiffs; (2) the various defenses available to the defendants; and (3) considerations of fairness, procedure, and manageability.”
  • not considering a job description that the employees largely disavowed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.