Smith v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing plaintiff’s case under Trial Rule 41(E
• a five- month delay was found excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-21· cited 9×
• Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-02-28· cited 2×
• Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-11
• Mahamud Sharif v. Brandon Cooper, City of Indianapolis, and Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-14

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Belcaster v. Miller
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-04-07· cited 53×
• Lee v. Friedman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-07-18· cited 31×
• Smith v. Huckins
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 19×
• Smith v. Maximum Control Facility
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 10×
• Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 9×
• Smith v. McKee
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 8×
• Smith v. Carrasco
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 7×
• Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 5×