Smith v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Semple decision went on to hold that any inference of homestead status in unoccupied land being prepared for occupancy may be destroyed by acts of the owner contrary to any homestead intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Brown
  M.D. Florida· 1994-02-14· cited 22×
• In Re Bratty
  S.D. Florida· 1996-11-29· cited 7×
• Renfro v. Dodge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 2×
• Flagship National Bank v. Gray Distribution Systems, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-21· cited 1×
• In re Geiger
  M.D. Florida· 2016-11-21· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Avila South Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Kappa Corp.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-13· cited 67×
• Mori v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. CORP., ETC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-29· cited 40×
• Semple v. Semple
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1921-07-30· cited 26×