Smith v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It was competent for the legislature to say to whom the land occupied and used by a railroad company should revert when abandoned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1898-12-05· cited 107×
• Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2014-03-10· cited 55×
• Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-11-05· cited 46×
• MacDonald v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1941-05-08· cited 25×
• Mark S. Rasmuson and Brenda S. Rasmuson, Husband and Wife v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-02-08· cited 24×
• Waddell v. Board of Directors
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1919-12-13· cited 23×
• Remey v. Iowa Central Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1902-02-14· cited 22×
• Jacobs v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1961-11-14· cited 21×
• Slater v. Shell Oil Company
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-06-19· cited 17×
• Atkin v. Westfall
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1955-04-05· cited 16×
• Turner v. Unknown of a Strip of Land One Hundred Feet in Width
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1973-05-23· cited 12×
• Notelzah, Inc. v. Destival
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-09-23· cited 5×
• Gates v. Colfax Northern Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1916-09-30· cited 4×
• Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Town of Churdan
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1923-12-11· cited 3×