Texas Supreme Court· 3/23/1949
Smith v. Hall
Citations
- 147 Tex. 634
- 219 S.W.2d 441
- 1949 Tex. LEXIS 453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a suit for specific performance of a contract regarding royalty rights did not fall within the mandatory venue provision of section 15.011’s predecessor
- holding that a suit for specific performance of a contract regarding royalty rights did not fall within the mandatory venue provision of section 15.011’s predecessor
- holding that a suit for specific performance of a contract regarding royalty rights did not fall within the mandatory venue provision of section 15.011 = s predecessor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hart, Smedley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Applied Chemical Magnesias Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 2006-08-31· cited 73×
- James W. Trenz and Terrane Associates, Inc. v. Peter Paul Petroleum Company and Posse Energy, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-08-09· cited 29×
- Batex Oil Company v. La Brisa Land and Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1961-12-13· cited 26×
- Allison v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1950-02-27· cited 23×
- Edgar v. BartekCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1974-03-29· cited 22×
- Lake v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-11-06· cited 21×
- Harwood v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-11· cited 14×
- Canales v. Estate of CanalesTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1984-11-30· cited 13×
- James v. Eagle Rock RanchCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-06-12· cited 12×
- Wagner v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-09-21· cited 12×
- O'Quinn v. DunaganCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-10-26· cited 11×
- Madeley v. OuallineCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-12-18· cited 7×
- Seale v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1953-06-18· cited 7×
- Owens v. Sherrard Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-07· cited 6×
- Murray v. FranklandCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-05-25· cited 6×
- Ashby v. Delhi Gas Pipe Line CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-09-03· cited 6×
- First National Bank of Yorktown v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-08-31· cited 6×
- Case-Pomeroy Oil Corp. v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1952-01-18· cited 5×
- Stephenson v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-17· cited 5×
- Woodworth v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1963-04-17· cited 5×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.