Smith v. Guest Pond Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the grant of a permanent injunction was improper because notice of a hearing on interlocutory relief did not constitute fair warning that the hearing would concern permanent injunctive relief
• vacating award of permanent injunction entered after initial hearing due to lack of notice such relief would be considered
• vacating award of permanent injunction entered after initial hearing due to lack of notice such relief would be considered
• vacating all orders in case where judge appeared as counsel to a party in a case pending before the same court in which the judge sits
• trial court may not consolidate a hearing on an application for an interlocutory injunction with a hearing on the merits of a complaint without consent of the parties
• where scheduling order issued following grant of TRO failed to specify that hearing would address merits of permanent injunction, appellant did not receive fair notice, and entry of permanent injunction was erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).