Skip to main content
· 3/20/2017

Smith v. Glanz

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 1335
  • 197 L. Ed. 2d 527
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3439
  • 2017 WL 1040953
  • 2017 U.S. LEXIS 1917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff failed to allege that the facilities at Chester were dissimilar in any relevant respect to other facilities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.