· 1/23/1964
Smith v. General Electric Co.
Citations
- 388 P.2d 550
- 63 Wash. 2d 624
- 1964 Wash. LEXIS 521
- 55 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The plaintiff argues that she was ignorant of the requirements of the collective-bargaining agreement, because she had not read it at the time of her discharge. This does not excuse her noncompliance with its terms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosellini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.