Smith v. F.W.D. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• electing not to resolve the briefed issue of “whether a product designer may be held strictly liable in tort for a design defect”
• electing not to resolve the briefed issue of \whether a product designer may be held strictly liable in tort for a design defect\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McMahon v. City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-04-22· cited 33×
• Smith v. Intergovernmental Solid Waste Disposal Ass'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-23· cited 27×
• Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Abc-Naco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-03-31· cited 20×
• Zanzig v. H.P.M. Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-06-28· cited 19×
• Doyle Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Board of Education
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-07-30· cited 16×
• Compass Health Care Plans v. Board of Education
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-25· cited 15×
• Harding v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-11-20· cited 12×
• O'Hare Express, Inc. v. City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-19· cited 11×
• Restore Construction Company, Inc. v. Board of Education of Proviso Township High Schools District 209
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2020-04-16· cited 7×
• Restore Construction Company, Inc. v. Board of Education of Proviso Township High Schools District 209
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2021-04-07· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pollack v. Marathon Oil Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-14· cited 44×
• Harms v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-01-17· cited 20×
• Evans v. Control Products Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-06-22· cited 11×