Skip to main content
· 3/4/1999

Smith v. Furlong

Citations

  • 976 P.2d 889
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1234
  • 1999 Colo. App. LEXIS 46
  • 1999 WL 110865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no basis to award “attorney fees” to a pro se litigant, because no “attorney fees” exist in such situations
  • holding that there is no basis to award “attorney fees” to a nonattorney pro se litigant because no “attorney fees” exist in such situations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hume, Marquez, Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.