Smith v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.

Citations

• 6 Cal. Unrep. 900
• 68 P. 490

Syllabus

<p>Nuisance.—On an Issue Whether an. Irrigation Ditch which plaintiff had authorized defendant to construct on his land had been materially enlarged by defendant at a later date, and without authority, so as to entitle plaintiff to damages, and to a judgment abating it as a nuisance, where the evidence was conflicting the finding of the trial judge that the ditch had not been materially enlarged was conclusive on appeal.</p>