District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/10/2008
Smith v. Florida Parole Commission
Citations
- 971 So. 2d 1028
- 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 247
- 2008 WL 89876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for further proceedings where, notwithstanding petitioner’s guilty plea as to curfew violation, Parole Commission failed to make findings as to whether violation was willful or substantial
- “Petitioner asserts that the Parole Commission was bound by the hearing examiner’s recommendation that he be reinstated to parole. This argument has been rejected by this court....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'nSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-10-22· cited 166×
- Mathis v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-15· cited 17×
- Houck v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-04· cited 8×
- Lopez v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 7×
Other cases named Smith v. Florida Parole Commission
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.