· 8/15/2003
Smith v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Smith)
Citations
- 299 B.R. 687
- 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1083
- 2003 WL 22092499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 60(b) should only apply when a court enters an order allowing or disallowing a claim “subsequent to a challenge to that claim”
- noting the court’s discretion to consider motion to dismiss before motion for class certification because “with no meritorious claims, certification of those claims as a class action is moot”
- “Although bankruptcy courts are Article I courts rather than Article III courts, their jurisdiction is derived from the district courts. Because the jurisdiction of district courts is limited by the case or controversy requirement, so is the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.