· 9/9/1994
Smith v. Exxon Corp.
Citations
- 647 A.2d 577
- 436 Pa. Super. 221
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of case against Exxon because it had only quality control over gasoline
- affirming dismissal of case against Exxon because it had only quality control over gasoline
- “As in Myszkowski, here, .the standards were implemented to maintain a uniform quality of service.”
- standards for product quality, store appearance, appearance of personnel and how to respond to customer complaints to preserve Exxon’s trademarks did “not amount to Exxon having control over the manner in which the work [was] accomplished.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Popovich, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.