Smith v. Employers Fire Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a pending motion to dismiss was sufficient to put the plaintiff on implied notice of an impending dismissal
• finding that a defendant’s motion requesting dismissal under Civ.R. 41(B)(1) constituted implied notice to the plaintiff that the case was subject to being dismissed and 7 satisfied the notice requirement in the rule
• noting that dismissals 7 with prejudice are reserved for “extreme circumstances”
• a pending motion to dismiss was sufficient to put the plaintiff on implied notice of an impending dismissal
• a pending motion to dismiss was sufficient to put the plaintiff on implied notice of an impending dismissal
• “appellant’s counsel received notice under Civ.R. 41(B)(1) at the time he became aware that appellee had filed his motion requesting the court to dismiss appellant’s claim with prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).