Fifth Circuit· 12/10/2004

Smith v. EMC Corporation

Citations

393 F.3d 590
22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 379
60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 234
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25461
2004 WL 2827942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court correctly denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend based on his undue delay and the proposed amendment’s undue prejudice to the defendants
explaining that a denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion
finding that the considerable delay and expense of having to reopen discovery would prejudice defendant
stating that Rsuelee a1l5so( aM) udloliens vn. oBta ilmickpiose a time limit “‘for permissive amendment’”
stating that Rsuelee a1l5so( aM) udloliens vn. oBta ilmickpiose a time limit “‘for permissive amendment’”
finding that a defendant is unduly prejudiced when forced to “prepare a defense for a claim” of which it has no prior notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Demoss, Dennis, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.