Smith v. EMC Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court correctly denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend based on his undue delay and the proposed amendment’s undue prejudice to the defendants
• explaining that a denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• finding that the considerable delay and expense of having to reopen discovery would prejudice defendant
• stating that Rsuelee a1l5so( aM) udloliens vn. oBta ilmickpiose a time limit “‘for permissive amendment’”
• stating that Rsuelee a1l5so( aM) udloliens vn. oBta ilmickpiose a time limit “‘for permissive amendment’”
• finding that a defendant is unduly prejudiced when forced to “prepare a defense for a claim” of which it has no prior notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).