Smith v. Dugger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The reviewing court’s judgement is, with respect to the merits, “the end of th[e] case[,]” and “[t]here [is] nothing which the circuit court [is] authorized to do but enter the decree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2015-12-10· cited 39×
• People Ex Rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. Circuit Court
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1931-12-17· cited 24×
• The People v. NAT'L BUILDERS BANK
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1957-11-20· cited 12×
• People v. Brown
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2022-06-16· cited 10×
• People v. Murray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-04-10· cited 4×
• Gee v. Hoeppner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1932-09-19· cited 2×
• Belding v. Belding
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1935-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boggs v. Willard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 15×
• Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. National Hollow Brake Beam Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1909-02-19· cited 13×
• Prentice v. Crane
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1909-04-23· cited 11×
• Smith v. Dugger
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1923-12-19· cited 9×