· 3/30/2016
Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We find that Wong’s holding regarding the FTCA’s time limits has no bearing on our analysis of the jurisdictional limitation provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a)’s presentment requirement.”
- “We find that Wong’s holding regarding the FTCA’s time limits has no bearing on our analysis of the jurisdictional limitation provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a)’s presentment requirement.”
- “Wong does not stand for the proposition that a party is not required to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit against the United States in federal district court”
- “[P]resentment requires actual receipt of the claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.