Smith v. Delaware Valley Auto Spring Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cited Rothman, supra, 469 A.2d 543 for the sole proposition that an attorney must have express authority to settle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Zimmerman
  D. New Jersey· 1992-01-08· cited 39×
• Manzitti v. Amsler
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-03· cited 29×
• Newark Branch, National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Township of West Orange
  D. New Jersey· 1992-02-14· cited 21×
• Burnett v. County of Gloucester
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-05-10· cited 19×
• Seacoast Realty Co. v. West Long Branch Borough
  New Jersey Tax Court· 1994-06-10· cited 15×
• Rockey v. Big Spring School District
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-05· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rothman v. Fillette
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-29· cited 96×
• Scott v. Purcell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 92×
• Keithley Edwards v. Born, Inc. Appeal of Keithley Edwards and Edith Edwards
  Third Circuit· 1986-06-11· cited 74×
• Archbishop v. KARLAK
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 51×
• Clarkson v. Selected Risks Insurance Company
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-09-10· cited 23×
• United States Plywood Corp. v. Neidlinger
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-11-04· cited 21×
• N. Rothenberg & Son, Inc. v. Nako
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-03-27· cited 20×