Smith v. Crown Publishers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting in part a motion to exclude the testimony of an expert witness because of the proffering party’s failure to disclose a list of other cases in which the expert had testified
• “Failure to comply with the mandate of the Rule is harmless when there is no prejudice to the party entitled to the disclosure.”
• “Failure to comply with the mandate of the Rule is harmless when there is no prejudice to the party entitled to the disclosure.”
• “The burden of establishing substantial justification and harmlessness is upon the party who is claimed to have failed to make the required disclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).