Skip to main content
· 9/24/1984

Smith v. Crook

Citations

  • 160 Cal. App. 3d 245
  • 206 Cal. Rptr. 524
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • California statute, like Utah’s, says “unless it appears from the will that such omission was intentional”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Racanelli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.