· 9/24/1984
Smith v. Crook
Citations
- 160 Cal. App. 3d 245
- 206 Cal. Rptr. 524
- 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2537
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- California statute, like Utah’s, says “unless it appears from the will that such omission was intentional”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Racanelli
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.