Skip to main content
· 1/30/2006

Smith v. Cowden (In Re Cowden)

Citations

  • 337 B.R. 512
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 102
  • 2006 WL 217931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the relevant date of transfer under the PUVTA is the date when the deed at issue was recorded
  • acknowledging the right of a devisee under Pennsylvania law to convey his interest in an estate pre-distribution
  • for federal principles of issue preclusion/collateral estoppel to apply, the issue sought to be precluded must be identical to the one that was decided in the prior action
  • for federal principles of issue preclusion/collateral es-toppel to apply, the issue sought to be precluded must be identical to the one that was decided in the prior action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: M. Bruce McCullough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.