Skip to main content
· 4/25/2001

Smith v. County Market/Southeast Foods

Citations

  • 44 S.W.3d 737
  • 73 Ark. App. 333
  • 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the interplay of objective tests and pain in the diagnostic process in describing a discogram as an objective test, even though it takes into account a patient's subjective pain response, because radiographic images of the dye are not subject to a claimant's manipulation
  • explaining the interplay of objective tests and pain in the diagnostic process in describing a disco-gram as an objective test, even though it takes into account a patient’s | ^subjective pain response, because radiographic images of the dye are not subject to a claimant’s manipulation
  • where doctor observed muscle spasm and muscle atrophy supporting claimant’s injury, this court found that involuntary muscle contraction or tension and shortness in the muscles has been held to be an “objective finding” and reversed the Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry D. Vaught

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.