Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/14/1987
Smith v. Cook County Hospital
Citations
- 518 N.E.2d 336
- 164 Ill. App. 3d 857
- 115 Ill. Dec. 811
- 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 3662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Six months was a reasonable time within which [the plaintiff] could have filed his complaint after the alleged fraud was discovered.”
- plaintiff suffering continuing back and leg pain cannot successfully claim doctor’s silence concealed injury
- point at which injured person becomes possessed of sufficient information concerning its injury and cause can be decided as a matter of law where facts are undisputed and only one conclusion may be drawn from them
- point at which injured person becomes possessed of sufficient information concerning its injury and cause can be decided as a matter of law where facts are undisputed and only one conclusion may be drawn from them
- no' fiduciary relationship exception to the due diligence requirement
- six months was “ample time”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Orlak v. Loyola University Health SystemIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 101×
- Dancor International, Ltd. v. Friedman, Goldberg & MintzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-05-21· cited 65×
- Turner v. NamaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-12-30· cited 39×
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-20· cited 33×
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. SykesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-20· cited 33×
- Foster v. PlautAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-27· cited 32×
- Neaterour v. HoltAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-28· cited 30×
- Butler v. Mayer, Brown and PlattAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-11-25· cited 29×
- Gredell v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-01-14· cited 27×
- Wisniewski v. Diocese of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-01-13· cited 26×
- Mauer v. RubinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-03-26· cited 24×
- Bloom v. BraunAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-11-01· cited 24×
- Wolf v. BueserAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-29· cited 22×
- Cramsey v. KnoblockAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-14· cited 21×
- Weidman v. WilkieAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-29· cited 15×
- Lissner v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-04-12· cited 14×
- McClendon v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-09-17· cited 13×
- Hauk v. ReyesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-13· cited 12×
- John Doe No. 2 v. Boy Scouts of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-01-13· cited 12×
- J.S. Riemer, Inc. v. The Village of Orland HillsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-05-10· cited 11×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 325×
- Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 239×
- Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 160×
- Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 137×
- Moore v. Jackson Park HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 114×
- Real v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-01-13· cited 42×
- Rio v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 36×
- Zagar v. Health & Hospitals Governing CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-04-22· cited 36×
- Greenock v. Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-09-27· cited 24×
- Prueter v. BorkAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-19· cited 24×
- Woodward v. Burnham City HospitalSupreme Court· 1980-10-06· cited 22×
- Brown v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-04-01· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.