Skip to main content
· 4/17/1989

Smith v. Commonwealth National Bank

Citations

  • 557 A.2d 775
  • 384 Pa. Super. 65
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citing, inter alia, section 187 for proposition that “Choice of law provisions in contracts will generally be given effect.”
  • applying Pennsylvania standard for summary judgment where New York substantive law governed the plaintiff’s claims
  • applying Pennsylvania standard for summary judgment where New York substantive law governed the plaintiff’s claims
  • applying Pennsylvania rule for summary judgment to an escrow agreement containing language that the agreement was governed by the laws of the state of New York
  • applying Pennsylvania summary judgment rules where New York substantive law governed the plaintiff’s claims
  • applying Pennsylvania summary judgment rules where another state’s substantive law governed the claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.