Supreme Court of Virginia· 11/14/1935
Smith v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 165 Va. 776
- 182 S.E. 124
- 1935 Va. LEXIS 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when employing the without-fault self-defense, the appellant must “have been without fault in the ‘minutest degree.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-01-21· cited 176×
- Harlow v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-10-12· cited 60×
- Morgen Industries, Inc. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1996-06-07· cited 57×
- Ross v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-10-11· cited 20×
- Newton v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1957-03-11· cited 19×
- Van Dyke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1955-04-25· cited 16×
- Harper v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1936-01-16· cited 13×
- Solomon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-03-01· cited 13×
- Banks v. BradleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1951-09-05· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dodson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1933-01-12· cited 36×
- James v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1930-03-13· cited 32×
- James v. HaymesSupreme Court of Virginia· 1933-03-16· cited 30×
- Pauley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1928-09-20· cited 17×
- Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1933-11-16· cited 11×
- Hardyman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1930-01-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.