Smith v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the decision in Webb “rested on broader grounds” than the mere fact that “others had access to the embezzled property and an opportunity to commit the crime”
• favorably analyzing circumstantial evidence, which led to reasonable inferences of guilt, in the context of embezzlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Welch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-22· cited 47×
• Zoretic v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-10-15· cited 33×
• Evans v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-10-14· cited 27×
• Dimaio v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-15· cited 24×
• Waymack v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-08-04· cited 24×
• Dove v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-10-07· cited 16×
• George v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-01-15· cited 10×
• Wells v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-05-01· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Webb v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1963-01-14· cited 155×
• Boykins v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1969-12-01· cited 51×
• Stegall v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-04-22· cited 29×
• Hewitt v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1973-03-05· cited 16×
• Foster v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-10-14· cited 10×
• Payne v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-09-05· cited 10×
• Challenor v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1969-04-28· cited 9×
• Revell v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-04-28· cited 4×