Smith v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he accomplice’s testimony was not sufficiently corroborated, and it was error to refuse a cautionary instruction. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and the case will be remanded for a new trial.”
• “[T]he accomplice’s testimony was not sufficiently corroborated, and it was error to refuse a cautionary instruction. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and the case will be remanded for a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-08-05· cited 75×
• Shavis Donta Holloman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-08-11· cited 38×
• Hedrick v. Warden of Sussex I State Prison
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2002-11-01· cited 29×
• Allard v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-04-21· cited 12×
• Ward v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1979-03-02· cited 5×
• Priscilla Ann Holmes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2022-11-22
• Juhwaan Barnes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2024-09-03

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Dillard v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-04-23· cited 34×