Skip to main content

Smith v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 435 S.E.2d 414
  • 17 Va. App. 68
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 211
  • 1993 Va. App. LEXIS 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendant acted in excusable self-defense when he retreated from the conflict as far as possible and shot another man, whose cocaine he had stolen, to prevent that man from shooting him
  • finding excusable homicide in self-defense requires “an overt act indicating the victim’s imminent intention to kill or seriously harm the accused” (emphasis added)
  • finding self-defense as a matter of law where defendant arguably provoked the initial confrontation, attempted to withdraw from the conflict, had no other reasonable avenue of escape, and took the only action available to prevent his death or serious bodily harm
  • excusable self-defense where defendant used deadly force after fleeing from armed intruders and being cornered in kitchen
  • “Any form of conduct by the accused from which the fact finder may reasonably infer that the accused contributed to the affray constitutes fault.” (cleaned up)
  • “Any form of conduct by the accused from which the fact finder may reasonably infer that the accused contributed to the affray constitutes fault.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.