Skip to main content
· 3/6/1996

Smith v. Commercial Transportation, Inc.

Citations

  • 470 S.E.2d 446
  • 220 Ga. App. 866
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1165
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one who is negligent in obstructing a roadway is not relieved of liability by the negligence of a motorist encountering the obstruction
  • foreseeability was fact question where accident occurred five or six hours after and two miles away from the defendant’s negligent act
  • evidence that truck was hauling an exempt product on the day of the accident is insufficient to show that it is used exclusively for that purpose
  • evidence that truck was hauling an exempt product on the day of the accident was insufficient to show that it was used exclusively for that purpose
  • “[A]s a general matter, it would be difficult to state that the possibility of subsequent collisions following an initial accident blocking the road is absolutely not foreseeable.”
  • “[A]s a general matter, it would be difficult to state that the possibility of subsequent collisions following an initial accident blocking the road is absolutely not foreseeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Beasley, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.