Smith v. Clark Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting a contractual clause to be a limitation clause and not a indemnity clause; Topp Copy v. Singletary, 533 Pa. 468, 626 A.2d 98 (1993)
• “Since Clark is not a named party and not a signatory to the agreement, it is not a party to the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).