Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff “was 3 never afforded a ‘full and fair opportunity’ to litigate the issues that were before the NLRB” 4 where she “was ‘not allowed to examine or cross-examine witnesses, lodge objections,’ or 5 otherwise litigate her claim”
• explaining principles of estoppel can apply to decisions of administrative agencies acting in a quasi-judicial capacity
• motion converted when extrinsic matters presented and considered in the superior court’s ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).