Seventh Circuit· 11/23/2015
Smith v. Chicago Transit Authority
Citations
- 806 F.3d 900
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20370
- 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,450
- 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 584
- 2015 WL 7423824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four-part test for establishing a prima facie case
- noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four- part test for establishing a prima facie case”
- noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four- part test for establishing a prima facie case
- noting the “legal analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII and § 1981 is identical”
- noting the “legal analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII and § 1981 is identical”
- the analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII is identical to the analysis for discrimination claims under Section 1981
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Sykes, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.