Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 11/23/2015

Smith v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 806 F.3d 900
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20370
  • 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,450
  • 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 584
  • 2015 WL 7423824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four-part test for establishing a prima facie case
  • noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four- part test for establishing a prima facie case”
  • noting that on summary judgment, “the plaintiff must first meet his burden of production on the familiar four- part test for establishing a prima facie case
  • noting the “legal analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII and § 1981 is identical”
  • noting the “legal analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII and § 1981 is identical”
  • the analysis for discrimination claims under Title VII is identical to the analysis for discrimination claims under Section 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Sykes, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.