Skip to main content
· 6/28/1991

Smith v. Chemical Personnel Search, Inc.

Citations

  • 576 N.E.2d 340
  • 215 Ill. App. 3d 1078
  • 159 Ill. Dec. 671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for repleading and noting that “an amendment should be allowed” if it is “in furtherance of justice” and any doubts “should be resolved in favor of the allowance of the amendment.”
  • “Doubts should be resolved in favor of the allowance of the amendment.”
  • “the most important consideration in determining whether an amendment should be allowed is whether it will be in furtherance of justice,” and any “[d]oubts - 22 - 2021 IL App (2d) 200039-U should be resolved in favor of the allowance of the amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.