Skip to main content

Smith v. Chapman

Citations

  • 564 P.2d 900
  • 115 Ariz. 211
  • 1977 Ariz. LEXIS 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that generally the question of proximate cause is for the jury
  • whether negligence is proximate cause of injury or damage is generally a question for the jury
  • court erred in directing verdict on punitive damage issue where there was sufficient evidence from which jury could have found defendant grossly negligent
  • “Punitive damages are not permitted in Arizona for mere negligence: there also must be shown a reckless or wanton disregard of the rights of others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.